Thomas at Technical Blogger has a great write-up of Google’s intrusion into everyone’s reasonable level of privacy expected when you’re out and about.
I have to thoroughly agree with his observations on the matter. The images they put out for everyone to see could lead to some serious invasion of privacy issues. I wonder just how many “secrets” have been exposed because of Google’s oversight in releasing this tech too early. Microsoft will clearly come out looking like the saint in this particular field, although they didn’t make it to “market” first. Why? Because they’ve taken the extra time to filter out faces, license tags, etc. that could be readily identifiable. That’s definitely the way to do things and not be evil. Google’s motto is slowly but surely falling by the wayside as they get bigger and bigger methinks.
Google apparently has an option where you can request removal of an offending image by reporting the offending image within the interface, but that’s a pretty poor way of going about it. Do they expect us to cruise around our virtual city streets that we travel for real every day just to see if we got snapped by Google’s invasive camera van? They should just pull the street level pictures altogether until they do it the right way like Microsoft is doing. If they wanted to follow their motto of “Don’t be evil”, they would, but I don’t really see that happening.
Do you?
Ian from The Newsroom posted a CBS news video clip of the story.


You bring up a good issue about the requesting removal of an image.
After Google has uploaded images for our city, must we use the system to ‘drive’ around where we have been to ensure that images we don’t want are not available?
It seems they are going to take a consumer confidence hit, and people are starting to question Google’s ‘don’t be evil’ motto.
I will say that I don’t necessarily think that Google did this maliciously, but when releasing this type of product it is sometimes best not to be the first, but to take your time and ensure all consumer confidence issues are properly addressed.
I don’t think they did it maliciously either. I think it’s more like, everyone loves us and will think this is cool and love us even more, not taking into account the fact that people like to think they have a small semblance of privacy when they’re away from home.
They’ll take a small black eye from this, then the Googilla will continue it’s march onward.
[…] James Moody at Geek In Paradise - The Google Street Maps Fiasco […]
Yep, fiasco it is…http://www.thenewsroom.com/details/394362?c_id=wom-bc-js
Thanks for that video Ian. I haven’t heard of any high-profile backlash from this incident so people have probably forgotten about it already. It’s not something that should be forgotten about though.
Have a great day!